Payment gateway questions, answered before you commit.
31 questions that come up on real onboarding calls, grouped six ways. Each answer names the scheme rule, regulation or contract clause it rests on, so you can check it rather than take it on trust.
Product-specific questions stay on the page that owns them — every cluster below links down to it. What sits here is the material that cuts across all thirteen products, plus the questions most gateways would rather answer on a call.
Applying, underwriting and going live
What we need, how long it takes, and where the line sits on who we board.
How long does it take to get from application to a first live payment?
A sandbox key is issued at registration — no contract, no call, no sales gate. Underwriting decisions run two to five working days once the file is complete, and the delay is almost always a missing document rather than a difficult judgement.
Shops running one of the supported plugins usually take live traffic in the same week the contract is signed. Custom integrations set their own pace, because the gating item is your release cycle, not our review.
What does underwriting actually need from us?
The standard anti-money-laundering file, plus your live shopfront. We read the site as a shopper would: terms, refund policy, delivery timescales and a working contact route all have to be visible before anyone pays.
- Company extract
- Three months old at most
- Beneficial owners
- Identified at 25% and above
- Settlement account
- IBAN in the trading name
- If you process today
- Six months of statements
Can we build the whole integration before anyone signs anything?
That is the intended order. The sandbox carries the full API surface — authorisation, 3-D Secure, webhooks, refunds and payouts — at no cost and with no volume ceiling.
Most teams have a working checkout before their first conversation with sales, which turns that conversation into one about rates rather than feasibility.
We already process elsewhere. What does moving actually involve?
Two things move: the traffic and the vault. Stored cards transfer under a scheme-approved provider-to-provider migration, so your customers keep their saved cards and the network tokens keep billing without a re-entry prompt.
We normally run both gateways in parallel for a fortnight and shift traffic by share. A single overnight cutover saves nothing and removes your fallback.
You decline more businesses than most gateways. Where is the line?
At acquirer risk appetite plus scheme brand-protection rules — and drawn at application, not after ninety days of monitoring. Adult, gambling, crypto exchange, forex and CFDs, nutraceuticals, debt collection and long forward-delivery models sit outside it.
Borderline structures — marketplaces, ticketing, high-ticket B2B — get a written risk position before a contract exists. A narrow book is what keeps approval rates steady for everyone already on it.
Rates, settlement and reconciliation
How a price is composed, when the money lands, and what a refund or a reserve does to it.
What actually moves the rate we are quoted?
Five inputs, in roughly this order of weight. A basket of consumer debit issued in your own market prices nothing like commercial cards issued outside Europe, and no blended headline can absorb that difference for long — it simply moves the drift somewhere you cannot see it.
- Card mix
- The single largest driver
- Merchant category
- Fixed at underwriting
- Average order value
- Weights the fixed fee
- Dispute history
- Reviewed at twelve months
When does the money actually reach our bank account?
Card settlement is T+2 by default, batched daily, with the payout instruction leaving on the same cycle. Euro-area transfers go out over SEPA Instant — mandatory for euro-area providers to send and receive since October 2025 — so the credit usually lands in seconds rather than the next working day.
Weekly or monthly cycles are available where your reconciliation would rather have fewer, larger files. The cadence is a setting, not a plan tier.
Will you hold a rolling reserve on our account?
Usually not, and a deliberately low-risk book is what makes that possible. Where a reserve does apply it is in the written offer with its percentage, its holding period and its release schedule stated before you sign.
What we do not do is introduce one mid-contract because a good month made the balance look attractive.
What happens to our costs when we refund a customer?
Interchange the scheme returns to us is passed back to you, and our margin on the original authorisation is not charged a second time. The refund itself carries no separate gateway fee.
A chargeback is a different instrument entirely: the scheme's dispute fee applies whether or not you go on to win the case. That asymmetry is why a clear billing descriptor pays for itself.
How is currency conversion handled, and who sets the rate?
You can settle in the currency you were paid in and keep the treasury decision, or have us convert into your settlement currency at a rate stamped on each settlement file with the conversion margin itemised on its own line.
Dynamic currency conversion at checkout is not offered by default. The economics of it favour whoever sells it, not the shopper who accepts it at the terminal.
Is there a minimum volume, a monthly fee or a lock-in period?
None of the three. No gateway rental, no charge for the sandbox, no minimum monthly turnover. Notice is thirty days.
The vault leaves with you under a scheme-approved export, so switching costs you an integration rather than your customer base. Lock-in through hostage tokens is not part of the commercial model.
Building and running the integration
Integration patterns, sandbox behaviour, versioning and what happens when something on your side goes quiet.
Hosted fields or the direct API — what really turns on that choice?
Your annual PCI paperwork, mostly. Hosted fields and hosted checkout keep every card-capture element on a BazPay origin, which is the condition that keeps you on SAQ A. The moment card data is typed into a form your own servers deliver, you are on SAQ A-EP with quarterly external scanning attached.
Both patterns look identical to a shopper. Only one of them lands on your audit calendar, so treat it as a scope decision rather than a styling preference.
How do we reproduce a decline, a challenge or a timeout on purpose?
The sandbox is deterministic, not random. Specific test cards return specific ISO decline codes, specific amounts force a 3-D Secure challenge instead of a frictionless pass, and a reserved value holds the request open until it times out.
Build your error paths against those triggers before you build the happy path. Every integration that hurts in month three skipped this step in week one.
How do you version the API, and how much warning do we get?
Versions are dated and pinned per account, so a new one never arrives because we deployed on a Tuesday. The previous version stays supported for twelve months after its successor ships.
Breaking changes are published in the changelog and pushed as a webhook event. Additive fields are not treated as breaking — parse defensively and they cost you nothing.
Our webhook endpoint was down for an hour. What did we lose?
Nothing, provided the receiving end follows two rules: verify the signature on every payload before parsing it, and treat delivery as at-least-once by deduplicating on the event identifier.
- Retry window
- 72 hours, exponential backoff
- Guarantee
- At least once, so dedupe
- Replay
- Any event, from the dashboard
We run a WooCommerce shop and have no developer. Is that a problem?
No. The plugins for WooCommerce, Adobe Commerce (Magento 2), PrestaShop 8 and OpenCart 4 cover checkout, refunds and webhook handling without code — configuration is a key paste and a saved settings page.
A developer becomes necessary only when you want behaviour the plugin deliberately does not expose, such as a bespoke retry ladder or split settlement.
What do you commit to on uptime, and where do we watch it?
The platform target is 99.9 per cent on the authorisation path, measured monthly and published on the status page rather than supplied on request. Incidents get a written note while they are still open, not a summary a week later.
Contractual remedies, where they apply, live in the agreement. We would rather you read that clause than take a figure from a marketing page.
Compliance, data and the audit file
What we hand an auditor, who is controller for what, and which records we are not allowed to delete.
Our auditor wants evidence, not assurances. What do you hand over?
A current PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance for the gateway, a responsibility matrix showing which requirement sits with whom, the data-processing agreement with its versioned sub-processor register, and a written statement of the SAQ level your integration pattern supports.
That last document is the one that ends the argument, because it names the pattern you actually deployed rather than the one you were sold.
Are you our processor, or a controller in your own right?
Both, and the agreement says which applies where. For processing you instruct — taking a payment, storing a token, issuing a refund — we act as processor under Article 28 of the GDPR.
For the fraud, sanctions and anti-money-laundering checks we are legally obliged to run, we are an independent controller. You cannot instruct us to stop performing them, which is precisely why the roles have to be split in writing rather than blanket-labelled.
What can we delete when we leave, and what are you forced to keep?
Tokens and the vault export are yours on request. Records tied to anti-money-laundering obligations are retained for five years from the end of the relationship, and no contract clause can shorten that.
Everything outside the statutory set is deleted on the schedule in the DPA rather than kept indefinitely because storage is cheap.
- AML records
- Five years, statutory
- Vault
- Exported to your next provider
- Everything else
- Deleted on the DPA schedule
A shopper sent their data-subject request to us but addressed it to you. What now?
We acknowledge it, we do not answer it on your behalf, and we forward it to your registered privacy contact within three working days with the transaction references attached.
Where we are the controller — the fraud and sanctions checks — we answer that part ourselves and tell you we have done so, so your own response stays complete.
We are a regulated financial entity. Does DORA change our contract?
It changes what has to be inside it. Where you fall under Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, the ICT third-party provisions — exit strategy, access and audit rights, incident-reporting timescales, subcontracting conditions — are added as a standing annex rather than negotiated line by line.
We also supply the register-of-information fields in the shape your supervisor expects, which is usually the part that consumes a quarter.
Methods, reach and authorisation rates
What a shopper can choose, how far the rails go, and why an authorisation rate moves.
What can a shopper actually choose at our checkout?
Visa and Mastercard, Apple Pay and Google Pay in-page, and the national schemes people in each market reach for first: iDEAL in the Netherlands, Bancontact in Belgium, BLIK and Przelewy24 in Poland, EPS in Austria.
SEPA Direct Debit and open banking bank transfer sit alongside them for recurring and high-ticket baskets. The method list is a configuration, not a second integration.
Can we take a card issued outside the EEA?
Yes — the licence is European, the card networks are not. An inter-regional credential authorises against the same acquiring contract and settles into the same balance; the difference shows up as an uncapped interchange line, not a refusal.
Strong customer authentication is formally out of scope for those one-leg transactions, though a foreign issuer may still choose to challenge. Local methods are the real limit: a national scheme only clears in its own market.
Our authorisation rate fell after we switched on 3-D Secure. What went wrong?
Almost always the data, not the protocol. A 3-D Secure 2 message carrying device signals, prior transaction history and a matching delivery address earns a frictionless pass; a sparse message earns a challenge screen, and every challenge screen loses a share of baskets.
The second suspect is soft declines being retried as fresh sales instead of re-presented with the authentication result attached. The dashboard separates the two, because the fix for each is different.
- Frictionless pass
- Full data set in the 3DS2 message
- Exemption request
- Carried by us, under PSD2 RTS
- Soft decline
- Re-present — never re-sell
How do subscriptions avoid an authentication screen every month?
The first charge is authenticated; the rest are flagged as merchant-initiated against that mandate. Fixed amounts on a fixed schedule stay exempt under Article 14 of the PSD2 technical standards, while variable amounts lean on transaction risk analysis and occasionally take a challenge.
Where the subscription is euro-denominated and predictable, SEPA Direct Debit sidesteps the question entirely — at the price of an eight-week no-questions refund right for the payer.
Is open banking a cheaper replacement for cards?
It is cheaper, and it is not a replacement. A bank transfer is pushed by the payer, so there is no chargeback to lose and no card to expire — but equally no card on file, and refunds go back as separate credit transfers.
It earns its place on high-ticket, one-off and B2B baskets. As a default checkout it costs you the convenience that made cards win in the first place.
Disputes, fraud and day-to-day operations
What a chargeback costs, when a ratio becomes a problem, and who answers at two in the morning.
What does a chargeback timeline actually look like?
The issuer raises it, we post it to the dashboard and fire a webhook the same day, and your evidence window is the scheme's rather than ours. Compelling evidence means delivery confirmation, the authentication result and the customer's own correspondence, uploaded once and completely.
If representment fails, pre-arbitration and arbitration carry fees that can exceed the disputed amount. On a small basket that makes conceding a commercial decision, not a defeat.
At what point does our chargeback ratio become a real problem?
Long before a scheme writes to you. Visa and Mastercard both operate monitoring programmes with published ratio thresholds and escalating fees, and once you are inside one the exit takes months of clean volume.
We open the conversation at our own lower watch-line with the decline and dispute breakdown attached, because the fix is usually operational rather than technical.
- Billing descriptor
- First fix for “I don’t recognise this”
- Delivery evidence
- Attach at dispatch, not at dispute
- Cancellation path
- Visible, or it becomes a dispute
Does fraud screening cost us good customers?
It can, which is exactly why the thresholds are yours rather than ours. Scores arrive with their reasons attached, borderline traffic can route to a review queue instead of a hard block, and allow lists survive rule changes.
A screening model whose reasoning you cannot see is a model you cannot tune — and an untunable model eventually gets switched off in a panic.
Something breaks at two in the morning. Who picks up?
Payment-path incidents route to an on-call engineer through the status page and the support address at any hour. Billing and account questions wait for working hours, because paging an engineer about an invoice helps nobody.
Accounts on the Platform plan have a named payments specialist who already knows the shape of your integration before the call starts.
Three things this page will not tell you
Each one has a real answer. It just needs your numbers, your entity or your counsel before it can be given honestly.
-
Your exact rate
Quoted at underwriting against your real card mix and volumes. A calculator here would produce a number nobody could honour.
-
Whether one specific business boards
Underwriting gives a written position in about a day. A guess on this page would cost you a week of building against it.
-
Legal or tax advice
We name the instrument and say where it applies. What it means for your entity is a question for your own counsel.
The remaining questions are about your numbers
Build against the live API today and price it later, or send the underwriting question first and skip a sprint. Either order works.